In the past several years our family has been made very, very aware of diet and health issues. These topics have become an integral part of our everyday lives and we have gained much benefit from the principals and patterns and yes, even laws that God gave to His people in His Word. It was quite an eye-opener to read and understand what all God had to say about such things as diet, hygiene, clothing choices, etc. . It was clear that God was not neutral in these areas and had much to say to His people if they would only listen.
Because God is not just concerned with whether or not you are saved, but is also interested in how you live your life everyday, that you follow His plans, and receive the benefits and blessings He intends you to have, or the consequences you have to endure should you choose not to, He gifted His people with many laws to direct their day to day lives, spiritual, physical and otherwise.
As is so often the case with Old Testament Law, God had much more in mind than just keeping His people in line. The significance of His laws in areas of diet, clothing, hygiene, etc. were to show His people and those around them, that they were His people, and He was their God, and He could and would take care of them as a testament unto the world of his love.
The following short article on hygiene came to me on Jordan Rubin’s Extraordinary Health e-newsletter. Issue 25 I found it quite interesting.
The History of Hygiene
Scripture tells us that the Israelites were healthier, had more wisdom, and provoked their neighbors to jealousy. Throughout history, the Jewish people have been the most hygienic and healthiest race on the planet-as long as they held true to God’s commandments.
In the past, their hygiene has protected them from virulent diseases. When the bubonic plague swept through Europe in the Middle Ages and wiped out more than a quarter of the population, many small pockets of observant Jews escaped the Black Death, which attracted much persecution. Medieval cities were filthy places without modern sewers or garbage collection, and rats (which carried the flea hosting the plague) lived in intimate contact with humans.
The Jews, however, knew that rats were “unclean” animals and stayed clear of them. They followed God’s simple hygiene commandments that the rest of the world thought were ridiculous. For instance, back in the Middle Ages, people used a “slop bucket” as the household toilet, and they became so inured to having sewage around that they slept in close proximity to their own human waste.
Compare this form of dirty hygiene to the Jews, who had been burying human waste since before the days of Moses. Nor would Jews of the Middle Ages drink from city wells because they knew the water was unclean. In order to stay kosher, Jews had to draw water from country springs.
Speaking from a hygienic standpoint, God’s chosen people avoided the Black Death like, well, the plague. This shouldn’t surprise us because the Jewish people have been keeping themselves separate and clean since they received this promise in Exodus 15:26 (NIV):
“If you listen carefully to the voice of the Lord your God and do what is right in his eyes, if you pay attention to his commands and keep all his decrees, I will not bring on you any of the diseases I brought on the Egyptians, for I am the Lord, who heals you.”
Think about the context of this Scripture. The Egyptians happened to be the most medically, culturally, and technologically advanced people in the world. They invented the calendar and hieroglyphics, a system of writing using characters in the form of pictures. They operated looms to weave cloth for clothing and made paper from papyrus reed plants. They used geometry to reset the boundaries of their fields after the Nile flooded. Two of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World lie within Egypt-the Lighthouse of Alexandria and the Great Pyramid of Giza. (And the Great Pyramid is the only surviving member of the Seven Wonders.)
On a medical note, they knew about diseases and attempted to treat them. Of course, the Pharaohs and their families eventually succumbed to what ailed them, but we know what diseases caused their deaths because the Egyptians discovered a clever method of preserving bodies to remain lifelike. The process, which we call mummification, called for embalming the bodies and wrapping them in strips of linen.
When modern-day scientists unwrapped and studied these mummies thousands of years later, they determined that Pharaoh and his family suffered from health problems that may sound similar to you: bone deterioration or osteoporosis, joint degeneration or arthritis, calcification of the arteries or heart disease, and malignancies similar to today’s cancers. In other words, the most medically, culturally, and technologically advanced society was populated by men and women with sub-par health.
Sound familiar? Could it be that believers today-God’s called-out people, the ecclesia, the church-are inheriting the health curses of Egypt rather than the health promises of Israel? These days, the United States of America is the world’s supreme superpower, but statistically speaking, we can hardly be called a world leader in good health.
We could change things around, though, if we live by honoring God’s commands–and that includes our diet and our lifestyle.
Perhaps if we as Christians were to pay attention to the principals and the intent behind God’s Laws (as opposed to shouting “We are not under law, but under grace!”) and keep them accordingly – not as any means unto salvation, or as a work required to please God, but as a means unto blessing, I think we would all be better off.
Not that we loved God, but that He loved us.
Allen
May 25, 2008 at 6:26 am
The article is very interesting! The health problems then sound alot like our present day health problems. So if we follow God’s laws even in health and nutrition, we’ll be healthy! Imagine that- doing what God says and we’ll be blessed! :-)
“We are not under law, but under grace!”
May 25, 2008 at 7:08 am
lol
May 25, 2008 at 11:08 am
No one knows how to better care for our bodies than the One who made them! Our family has also been learning alot about how God intended for us to eat and live. Good food takes more time to prepare (unless you live off of raw milk for awhile; it’s an excellent “convenience” food), but it “pays” off in the end in more ways than one. We just need to work on the lifestyle part of the equation, namely, waking and sleeping with the sun. Electric lights- a blessing and a curse!
May 25, 2008 at 6:47 pm
We’ve been doing our best to eat according to Biblical principles for many years. Our health is not perfect, but I’m blessed to say we don’t have to make many trips to see doctors. I pray you will be blessed by what you’re learning. ~Beth
May 26, 2008 at 11:58 am
Hmmm…
Out of curiosity Allen, what’s your view of Acts 10? Not trying to start a fight here, but it seems to me that much of the ceremonial ‘this is clean, that is unclean’ laws given to Israel were abrogated in this passage. That is, fulfilled in Christ and no longer binding on believers. Another example: Jesus and his disciples were upbraided by pharisees for not washing before a meal.. Am I missing something?
Please don’t misunderstand; I’m not against cleanliness and eating right. I’m just trying to get a handle on the right way to apply Israel’s laws today. How do we know what’s still obligatory and what’s not?
With Respect,
Randall
May 26, 2008 at 7:15 pm
Hmmm…
Interesting comment Randall. My Dad is working on comments of his own as time permits, but in the meanwhile, I thought I would give my two cents.
Perhaps we are not in disagreement after all.? I assume you did notice that nowhere in the article or Dad’s comments was it stated that following Old Testament dietary or hygienic laws is an “obligatory” requirement for Christians today. What you WILL find proclaimed is the fact that these laws were much more than directives designed to teach God’s people a spiritual truth. They were and are both the wisest and healthiest guidelines available. This is not simply a pietistic evaluation of the matter either, for if one has the guts to look outside the blown-up, exaggerated, and falsified claims of mass media and the AMA, he will find that the best science available confirms and verifies that God knew what He was doing every step of the way. Compare that to the track record of modern medicine, which is the third leading cause of death in America, killing 250,000 people a year, and one begins to think that perhaps we should stop waiting for every thing else to fail before taking God’s directions seriously!
Just a thought, Randall, but have you considered that the issue of clean and unclean foods was a distinction established well before the Mosaic Law was even in existence? Take Gen. 7:2 for example where God instructed Noah to take clean animals by sevens and unclean animals by twos, (it is also interesting that it was at the time of God’s covenant with Noah that He instituted the eating of meat). It actually makes more sense Biblically that God established animals as clean or unclean first as an aid to maintaining health and then used this same distinction, already established and recognized, to later teach His children the spiritual lesson of holy and unholy and to set them apart from the nations around them.
Usually, in my experience, those who take issue with us explaining the relevance of God’s instructions concerning health do so not out of a zeal for maintaining the purity of the Gospel, or true BIBLICAL freedom, but because they have made their stomach their god. It is these same people that scream “legalist” when we explain that it is not necessary to even use the law to advocate appropriate eating practices. For example, unless one is suffering form a genetic disposition or other unalterable handicap obesity is an unbiblical condition, because it is usually brought about or attained through failing to use self-control and discretion in their eating habits. According to the Bible such negligence is called gluttony, and is condemned throughout many places in Scripture, (Ps. 78:18-31, Prov. 23:1-3 & 20-21, Phil. 3:17-19 etc.).
One last thing. Although your first example is both good and correct, you do appear to be “missing something” when it comes to the second. In the example you use, (Mark 7:1-23), the Pharisees and scribes were not taking issue with Jesus over anything as pertaining to the Law. Rather, they were finding fault with His failure to keep “the traditions of the elders,” which is to say the “commandments of men,” added to God’s Law, not God’s Law itself.
With Respect,
Tyler
May 28, 2008 at 3:27 am
Greetings all,
I am grateful to both you and your father, Tyler, for having brought this subject up. I wrestled for years over these issues. Your responses have been Biblically sound, in my opinion.
One area which I have found vehement disagreement over, though, is the use of Acts 10 to justify the abrogation of all the so-called ‘ceremonial’ laws. I personally don’t see the health laws given to Israel as ceremonial, in the strict sense. There is much more comprehensive application to them than we in our present culture have been taught to appreciate.
That’s just my two cents worth at 5:30 a.m.
Blessings,
Jim K.
May 28, 2008 at 7:14 am
Tyler,
I have some minor quibbles, and then I’ll let the matter drop. I simply don’t see this as an issue christians need to fight over, interesting perhaps, but nothing that should compromise charity between brothers.
I would only point out that ’science’ and the Bible have never been, and aren’t today, in agreement with regard to what is healthy and what is not. Science regards rabbit meat as very healthy; the Bible calls rabbits unclean. Science regards shrimp, crab, lobster as healthy, the Bible calls them unclean. These are only examples off the top of my head. Secondly, when God gave these laws, the Scriptures never state that they were for matters of health, but rather for matters of holiness and to make a distinction between Israel and the nations surrounding them. Thirdly, I never called you, or your excellent father a legalist, and I would not presume to do so from 800 plus miles away. I would appreciate it if you would refrain from calling me a glutton who idolizes his stomach.
Finally, if Acts 10 means anything at all, it means that we may eat anything at all, and the ancient distinctions of clean and unclean are abolished. The church has always held this from the beginning. We DO have freedom in this area. Now, if you want to discuss this as a wisdom issue, and discuss the health merits of eating rabbit or shrimp, that would be more appropriate, in my opinion then discussing it as law we must keep, in the same way we are to keep the decalogue and the general equity of the case law attaching to it. The two bodies of law are not the same according to the New Testament, again, IMHO.
Randall
May 28, 2008 at 11:34 am
“Perhaps if we as Christians were to pay attention to the principals and the intent behind God’s Laws (as opposed to shouting “We are not under law, but under grace!”) and keep them accordingly – not as any means unto salvation, or as a work required to please God, but as a means unto blessing, I think we would all be better off.”
I’m glad to have found your blog today. :)
I couldn’t agree more! I’ll not throw my 2¢ in on the Acts 10 thing other than to say that neither our Master nor the Apostles were false prophets who taught contrary to the Law or would have ever considered it “done away with” (The Master Himself said that the Law would not be abolished till heaven and earth pass away – yet here we are…). Salvation has always been through grace (which means favor). The Spirit has always led those who are saved by faith into obedience to the Father, the Spirit cannot contradict the Father. Obedience is from a heart of love and devotion, because we are saved.
Blessings ~
Lisa
May 29, 2008 at 7:54 pm
In beginning this blog back in January of this year, one of the things I had to decide upon was whether or not to allow comments. As I stated back then, we at Promised Land “retain the right to be wrong ourselves at times and pray we will remain teachable.” I stated that we (my family and I) “are in a constant process of sanctification, and should the Lord (or any of His saints) show us where we err, we wish to repent of those ways!” This is precisely the reason I opened Promised Land up for everyone to comment on our posts and carry on conversations and discussions. I would not dare to suppose that my views are always correct views – I too am fallible. I do not believe that by surrounding myself by, and speaking to, only those who are in 100% agreement with me, can I remain teachable. It is because of this that I encourage all to respond if they wish to reason and discuss (not debate) all these issues. Perhaps I might learn something – perhaps you and your comments may cause me to rethink something and even change my views on some things. Perhaps something we say here will cause another to reconsider their own views, open up God’s Word and study the issues. Everyone needs to keep in mind that the Bible commends the Bereans in Acts 17:11 for questioning what the Apostle Paul had to say and make sure his teachings were in agreement with the scriptures. As far as I am concerned – if these posts and comments cause someone to open their Bible and study God’s Word more closely, then we all win, Christ will be glorified, my purposes will be accomplished.
Now, all that being said, I invite anyone to comment on this blog as long as it (as I stated in our ABOUT page) glorifies God and is edifying to the body of Christ. If therefore I, as moderator, believe any comment does the opposite, I will delete it! I will not allow any personal pot-shots!
But at the same time, you may feel safe, even in disagreeing with me. Come, let us reason together.
Christine, Taci, Beth, Randall, Tyler, Jim and Lisa – Thanks for the encouraging comments. Randall, I would just like to address your comments as I believe we have misunderstood each other. Let me assure you, I did not think you were being antagonistic in any way in your first comment. None in my household were offended in any way. In fact we were all quite excited to have someone bring a question to the table to discuss. We think these are good and honest questions that I am sure many in the blogsphere would like some clarification on. As a result, my son was excited to engage you in a discussion. His use of your own words in the greeting and ending salutation was precisely because he felt you were giving godly, thoughtful consideration to the issue. He was attempting to show his respect “of you” and “to you” by using your own words. “Hmmm – good thought!” As to the references to Legalist and Glutton, none were directed at anyone, including you. He was merely relating to conversations with other Christians he has had here in Twin Falls. I will also tell you that before Tyler posted his comment, he brought it before me as his father and head of this household, for approval. I did so because I understand Tyler’s heart on the subject and also his admiration of you and your opinion as a Christian brother. I also understood the best of intentions on your part Randall. So brother – all is good! Questions on how to better apply God’s laws and the principals within them are always exciting to talk about, and should be engaged in with fervor and gusto.
So, back to the subject at hand!
“Out of curiosity Allen, what’s your view of Acts 10? Good question! I think that in order to study any scripture, the text must be kept in context. I feel it is taking the issue out of context to turn this passage into just a food and freedom issue. Quite honestly, I believe the point of Acts 10 was hardly directed at the issue of food at all. I think the point about food was secondary. Yes, the clean/unclean food issue had to be resolved in order address the more important issue of clean/unclean people. I see the food being used as a metaphor to help Peter understand that God was going to cleanse the Gentiles as well as the Jews and also as a tool for him to use in accomplishing the task God was assigning to him. We have to remember who Peter was, what his background was, his upbringing and his training and understand that because of these things, he could not associate with non-Jews. We also must understand that it was Peter whom God desired to use as an instrument to bring the gospel to the Gentiles. Something had to change, and by using this imagery I believe that Peter understood God’s intent perfectly, although he later had to be reminded and rebuked about the issue in Galatians 2. I think if you read Acts 10, 11 and 15 it is clear that in the beginning, the emerging church consisted of believing Jews only and we all know now that the Gospel message was to include Gentiles (you and I) as well, but none of the Apostles would have gone against the “law” to take it to them had not God himself made the change. God was showing Peter that it was He, God, who cleanses the hearts of man and who was Peter to disagree. In relating the dream incident later in Acts 11:1-18, to the other Apostles and again to the church elders and Apostles at Jerusalem in Acts 15:1-27, I think Peter was quite clear that he too believed the context of the dream to be that of accepting Gentiles, not just unclean foods. To get hung on the freedom issue, although it is present, I believe is to oversimplify God’s intent.
My take on the whole freedom issue really boils down to this -
God allows us to eat of those things so that we do not become a stumbling block or a hindrance to showing Christian charity to others and thus hindering the Gospel. As Paul states in I Cor.8:12 – Yes, you can eat those things – by doing so you are neither better nor worse off in God’s sight – You cannot sin by eating those things, BUT you can sin against your brothers and against Christ by insisting on your freedom to do so. With the freedom comes the greater responsibility.
All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. I Cor. 6:12
All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not. I Cor. 10:23
Is not following these dietary laws expedient? Is it edifying to not do so? And under what circumstances? Do any have power over me – do I insist on having my way?
Now, as to my opinion on my original post and the Levitical dietary laws in general.
No, we are not under law, but under grace, but I would like to explore these dietary laws (which we are not bound to as a means of salvation) and ask – What was God’s intent in giving these laws? By doing this I am not asking, as the serpent did – Hath God really said? I say God is not the Author of confusion, so there has to be sound reasoning behind all this!
Some of my thoughts are as follows….
• I do not believe that God established these laws only to set the Israelites apart from other nations although they certainly did.
• I believe God also established these laws because He cares intimately for His people. God is not about making His people miserable. As Jim Ketchum quoted in an earlier post – I John 5:3 For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments; and His commandments are not grievous. This verse may sound to some like an oxymoron. God’s Love – God’s Commandments. They may sound opposite, but they are the same! I think our Americanized Christianity denies God’s love for us by chafing so against His commandments and laws.
• I believe that God established the dietary laws about clean and unclean animals precisely because there are clean and unclean animals! It is just plain unwise and unhealthy to eat some things. He states His reason for giving these laws (at least partially) in Lev. 11:47 To make a difference between the beasts that may be eaten and the beast that may not be eaten. Because He cares for you! It was not just to say, “You are an Israelite, everyone else is not.” It is also interesting that in many cases, it is against man’s laws to eat these animals as well.
• I do believe that God tells us that by not following His laws, there will be consequences. And He is quite clear that some of those consequences will be in the form of health problems. It is written many places in scripture that these laws were for the health of the Israelites..
• I cannot buy the “the law was fulfilled / abolished / abrogated argument.” I feel this is misinterpreting the scriptures. By this tack of reasoning it is just as OK to commit adultery, to steal, to kill, to worship other gods, etc. as it is to eat foods on this list. I know of no one who will argue for the abolishment of the 10 commandments – although they are not a means to salvation, they are still to be kept out of love for God and our fellow man. Would you not agree that they are just as important today as they were in the desert of Sinai in regards to our relationships with mankind as well as God Himself? What makes the 10 any different? Does God change?
• God’s Word does indeed disagree with the best of today’s science in many areas, but that just means that in those areas, I am to disagree with science too! Although in the area of healthful diets, I do not think there is much disagreement.
Because we are “not under law” and we do have freedom in this area as Randall pointed out. I will say that this whole issue, in this whole post, and every comment written my myself as well as everyone else (so far as I can tell) – no one has ever stated it is anything other than a wisdom issue. I want to point out just a few examples of the wisdom I find in God’s dietary laws/guidelines/suggestions.
1. Unclean fouls – eagles, vultures, ospreys, kite, buzzard, raven, hawk, owl, heron, etc. Every single one is a predatory bird that feeds on the flesh of dead animals. Their systems are such that rotting flesh and the resultant bacteria is not harmful, yet this bacteria is within and on these birds making them dangerous to eat or even handle. It also mentions fouls that creep on all fours, like bats. I know of no culture that is so ignorant so as to approve of eating this animal.
2. Unclean four footed animals – those that have paws among others – pigs, dogs, cats, weasels, martin, ferret, rabbit, mouse, bear, cougar, etc. Again, although some are omnivorous, most are predatory animals that feed on dead flesh, that carry harmful bacteria and diseases that can be passed on to humans. During trapping season, it is always a good idea to wear rubber gloves to prevent the spread of disease and flesh eating bacteria to the handler. Any trapping manual will tell you to be very careful handling these animals. In the case of the pig, (an omnivore that can actually thrive on other swine’s feces in confinement operations) harmful parasites, bacteria and disease can be harbored within the flesh itself and passed to humans. In 1995, in the state of Texas, there were several cases of people being infected with type M Leprosy by eating armadillos. Clean? Notice all clean animals are ruminants with cloven hooves. Get this, like…Grass fed beef, goat and lamb. Modern science is just now realizing the true health benefits of eating such meats.
3. Unclean things that live in water – those that do not have both fins and scales are mostly (if not all) fish or animals that are designed to clean up the water, taking in all kinds of pollutants and toxins. The dangers of eating shellfish have long been recognized and documented. The largest outbreak of cholera in US history occurred in Louisiana in 1986 and was caused by eating these animals.
4. Even in the case of clean meats – the scriptures tell us, if you find your pet cow dead in the pasture, you are not to eat it. Good advise because you probably have no idea what killed it and the blood (which carry viruses) had not been properly drained.
5. No, every law that God declared was not for spiritual purposes – many were designed to keep man healthy and removed from danger of disease transmission.
Lets just forget that the word “law” was ever associated with any of these “un” foods. The fact is, God made every single creature on the face of the earth. He designed many of them to do specific jobs, like ridding the earth of rotting, dead things which if left unchecked would decimate man by disease. God made the product and then He wrote the owner’s manual. I believe that God did it for our good. I believe He did it out of love for us. I do not believe that God gives bad, or irrelevant advise. Nor does He change.
I would like to end by again quoting Mr. Jordan Rubin, from his book The Maker’s Diet
Randall – IMHO? Forgive me, I’m from the backwoods of Idaho.
Recommended reading:
• The Maker’s Diet by Jordan Rubin
• What the Bible Says About Healthy Living by Rex Russell, M.D.
Allen
June 18, 2008 at 8:07 pm
Allen,
Please forgive me for leaving you hanging for so long. I’m relieved to know I have not offended; and you may rest assured that I wasn’t offended either. My manner of writing, unfortunately, can come across as a bit combative, and I apologize for that. I’ve tried and tried to moderate the way I type, but I’m afraid all I can ever manage is a continual pounding on the keyboard.
The meat of our minor disagreement seems to revolve around my use of the term ‘abrogate’. I’m sure you will agree that Israel, as a nation in covenant with God, ceased to exist in 70 A.D. When we speak of the covenant people of God today, we mean the church, jew and gentile alike, wherever they are found worshipping in truth the triune God. By necessity then, the laws in the O.T. which governed the temple, the priesthood, the sacrifices, feasts and other related observances particular to the sons of Jacob have all ceased. The writer to the Hebrews calls all these ceremonial elements of the law ‘obsolete’. He further states that these pre-figured Christ; and have all found their fulfillment in Christ. There has always been some discussion among believers concerning where to place the dietary laws, however. Do they belong among the decalogue and case laws derived from them, and are therefore binding morality on all God’s people for all time? Or, are they ceremonial in nature, pertaining to the days of old Israel, and are therefore ‘obsolete’?
How each believer answers this question will determine how much weight is placed on keeping the dietary law. The danger in equating the moral law with dietary law is this: The Church has a government here on earth, and that government must exercise discipline over the members of Christ’s body. If the dietary laws are morally binding today, then the church has a responsibility to preach them and enforce them. Yet, the only dietary prohibition I can find in the New Testament is in Acts 15, when the church fathers in Jerusalem charged gentile believers to abstain from ‘things strangled’ and ‘from blood’. Beyond these two, I can’t consider the dietary laws morally binding on believers today. If they’re not morally binding, then the church shouldn’t act as though they are.
I do agree with you, and St. Paul, that while all things are lawful, not everything edifies, however. May the Lord guide us all, moment by moment, as we seek to follow not just the letter, but the Spirit of the Law.
randallgerard
June 18, 2008 at 8:11 pm
P.S.: IMHO = ‘in my humble opinion’
June 18, 2008 at 11:59 pm
Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway … nice blog to visit.
cheers, Consecutive.
June 26, 2008 at 3:33 am
Brethren,
“All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.” II Tim. 3:16-17
I’m not sure if we ever fully discussed where the dietary and other health codes fall within the framework of being ‘ceremonial’ or stand-alone laws concerning the protection and building up of the health of the people of God. We certainly have the example found in Daniel chapter 1 to point to as God blessed the covenantal faithfulness of the princes of Israel who would not eat the king’s food.
I would agree in part with Randall that keeping the dietary laws is not necessary for salvation. But I would also point out that our LORD kept those same laws, as a testimony to us.
Again, our struggle is not with the dietary laws and health codes themselves, but with how God would have us apply them in our present day. Seeing as how our ‘modern’ world has openly rejected God’s Law in so many other areas, it’s not surprising they reject His Law in this area also, to their own physical detriment.
While my thoughts on this are still being worked out in application in my own life, it’s important to judge our own thoughts and actions according to God’s Word.
Blessings,
Jim K.
January 13, 2009 at 11:49 am
Healthy Debate is a good thing – One thing is
for certain – those who try to live the Good
Lord intended – seem to be such happier people.
Anyone have a thought on that? We try to do this life our way – always wanting more – nothing seems to satisfy – For me and my house -
we will serve the Lord. Aloe Lady